←back to thread

432 points nobody9999 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
concinds ◴[] No.46246274[source]
It feels like courts are not doing a good job promoting "competition".

- Apple shouldn't be able to charge for external payments, come on.

- Force prominent disclosure of refund policies. Epic Games doesn't allow them for IAP. Apple does. Epic knows exactly how predatory that is, betting some kids will find ways to spend thousands and the parents will be helpless. Ideally you'd have a law mandating refunds, but without that, there should be mandatory disclosure on the IAP screen, at least for microtransaction games. You can't have fair "competition" when you have an information asymmetry, and if these rulings don't mandate that, you'll open the floodgate for these gaming companies to screw over parents.

replies(4): >>46246370 #>>46246385 #>>46246762 #>>46249658 #
1. tick_tock_tick ◴[] No.46249658[source]
> Force prominent disclosure of refund policies.

100% agree Apple should be forced to have a big banner on explicitly stating they have no refund policy and it's all whatever they feel like this week. Which funny enough is also basically their app approval process.