←back to thread

91 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
blipvert ◴[] No.46248600[source]
Any reason why they wouldn’t use EDIFACT instead?
replies(3): >>46248744 #>>46249175 #>>46250098 #
1. blipvert ◴[] No.46248744[source]
OK, it’s been a long time since I worked in this space. Seems like it’s an XML version of the INVOIC message, but is it required to support the XML syntax, or does the plain old EDI format suffice?