←back to thread

157 points robtherobber | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
lysace ◴[] No.46245508[source]
Fighting extremist terrorism requires tough measures. This one is a bit extra though:

> If the software cannot be deployed remotely, the law authorizes officers to secretly enter a person’s home to gain access.

Clear Das Leben der Anderen vibes. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lives_of_Others)

However: As usual, the devil is in the details. How much suspicion is required, what's the process, etc. (I assume that a judge needs to sign off.)

replies(5): >>46245612 #>>46245695 #>>46245801 #>>46245950 #>>46247554 #
gwbas1c ◴[] No.46245950[source]
The big shift is that law enforcement now has to do their job, instead of trying to make tech companies do their job.

Even more important: The cost of surveillance this way is very high. It's not practical to perform massive surveillance this way, so it requires a reason for targeted surveillance.

replies(2): >>46246001 #>>46247890 #
1. lysace ◴[] No.46247890[source]
The cost aspect and its consequences: That's a good insight.