←back to thread

348 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
anthk ◴[] No.46243905[source]
Why not Go? It's more portable.
replies(7): >>46243939 #>>46243943 #>>46243983 #>>46244203 #>>46244559 #>>46262087 #>>46262252 #
hu3 ◴[] No.46243939[source]
and easier to learn.

and better funded.

and easier to find devs.

replies(3): >>46244004 #>>46244128 #>>46245136 #
ramon156 ◴[] No.46244004[source]
They both suck getting new devs for

Also, just because it's part of Google doesn't make go better funded. Theyd probably be fine killing go.

Definitely easier to learn though :P

replies(2): >>46244323 #>>46244506 #
1. hu3 ◴[] No.46244506[source]
> They both suck getting new devs for

I'm willing to be Rust suck a ton more to hire devs. Since, as we both agree, Go is easy to learn. Any C#, PHP or Java dev can get going with Go in not time.