←back to thread

199 points rguiscard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
VladVladikoff ◴[] No.46240782[source]
If the goal is reduced CO2, wouldn’t it be better to take aim at plants, rather than fungi?
replies(2): >>46241005 #>>46241312 #
otabdeveloper4 ◴[] No.46241312[source]
> If the goal is reduced CO2

... let's start on tearing down bullshit AI datacenters.

Oh no, a billion Nvidia cards are envronmentally friendly, you say, better to lazer-focus on the cow farts?

replies(2): >>46241383 #>>46241392 #
ragequittah ◴[] No.46241383[source]
The cow farts, the important forests being torn down far cattle, the important forests being torn down for soy beans that feed the cattle, the inhumane conditions in which the cattle are raised. The problem you dismissed is indeed far larger than the one you're worried about.
replies(2): >>46241461 #>>46241937 #
mos87 ◴[] No.46241461[source]
>the important forests being torn down far cattle

It's a bit extreme to refer to that "climate" summit "guests" as cattle, but I won't deny it gave me a chuckle.

>the inhumane conditions in which the cattle are raised

Gosh, that's sad. One way to go about it is to vote with your hard-earned and only buy meat from the Ethically Raised in the Swiss Alps Cows that look quite happy on the photos then.

replies(3): >>46241636 #>>46241666 #>>46243116 #
1. ben_w ◴[] No.46243116[source]
> Gosh, that's sad. One way to go about it is to vote with your hard-earned and only buy meat from the Ethically Raised in the Swiss Alps Cows that look quite happy on the photos then.

In a discussion about genetically modified fungus as a meat substitute?