←back to thread

199 points rguiscard | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
VladVladikoff ◴[] No.46240782[source]
If the goal is reduced CO2, wouldn’t it be better to take aim at plants, rather than fungi?
replies(2): >>46241005 #>>46241312 #
otabdeveloper4 ◴[] No.46241312[source]
> If the goal is reduced CO2

... let's start on tearing down bullshit AI datacenters.

Oh no, a billion Nvidia cards are envronmentally friendly, you say, better to lazer-focus on the cow farts?

replies(2): >>46241383 #>>46241392 #
curtisf ◴[] No.46241392[source]
Livestock emits between 10% to 20% of global greenhouse gases (in carbon equivalent/100y-GWP) [1]

In contrast, all data centers (not just AI) currently use less than 1.5% of all electricity, making up less than 0.3% of global emissions [2]. Although recent increases in data center electricity usage is lamentable, even in the short term future, much of this can and more importantly _will_ be low-carbon energy, and the ratio should continue to improve with time.

A 1% reduction in livestock emissions is therefore about the same as a 50% reduction in data center emissions.

[1]: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environm...

[2]: https://www.carbon-direct.com/insights/understanding-the-car...

replies(2): >>46241442 #>>46241930 #
otabdeveloper4[dead post] ◴[] No.46241930[source]
[flagged]
1. literalAardvark ◴[] No.46242765[source]
The numbers are what the numbers are, not what you want them to be.

Minimizing cow farts is simply a better focus.

replies(1): >>46243159 #
2. otabdeveloper4 ◴[] No.46243159[source]
I never said anything about electricity consumption in my origional post, my disingenuous friend.