←back to thread

171 points rguiscard | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.791s | source
Show context
SapporoChris ◴[] No.46240533[source]
They've altered Fusarium venenatum which is currently what Quorn utilizes in its products. "The production process of gene-edited MP is more environmentally friendly than chicken meat and cell-cultured meat." That's good news, if they get to the point where it is more economically friendly than chicken meat it will be great news.
replies(4): >>46241584 #>>46241830 #>>46242175 #>>46242217 #
shrubble ◴[] No.46241584[source]
There’s little chance that the statement is true. Chickens kept in a backyard can live on bugs and kitchen scraps and there’s no delivery cost for eggs or eventual meat.
replies(6): >>46241629 #>>46241634 #>>46241652 #>>46241654 #>>46241659 #>>46241946 #
swiftcoder ◴[] No.46241946[source]
Back of the envelope, for a family of 4 eating US quantities of chicken... you need to be slaughtering ~100 chickens per year. In a homesteading setting it usually takes a chicken about 12 weeks to reach slaughter weight, so you need to be raising a minimum of 25 at any time.

That's a pretty substantial backyard operation.

replies(3): >>46242224 #>>46242356 #>>46242691 #
1. vintermann ◴[] No.46242356[source]
If everyone had backyard chicken operations on that scale, I suspect we'd have a lot more disease problems! Decentralized isn't necessarily better for disease, if the overall scale stays the same.

At least where I live, you can't have chickens in quite the same way our great-grandparents had. You need to comply with veterinary regulation for one, and for good reasons.

replies(1): >>46243212 #
2. a96 ◴[] No.46243212[source]
If every yard in a town or city was full of chickens, I wouldn't call it decentralized. Just one very broad centre.
replies(1): >>46243275 #
3. K0balt ◴[] No.46243275[source]
Or you could just call it the developing world lol. It’s very common in many places.