←back to thread

Programmers and software developers lost the plot on naming their tools

(larr.net)
330 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
pdpi ◴[12 Dec 25 00:03 UTC] No.46239164[source]▶
GNU's version of Yacc is called Bison. Pine Is Not Elm (even though that was never an official acronym). UNIX was UNICS which was a pun on MULTICS. I couldn't for the life of me tell you what dd stands for. nano is a copy of pico which was the "PIne COmposer". Postfix is a completely opaque portmanteau of post (as in mail) and "bug fix". C++ is "C incremented", and C is the successor of B, which is the successor of BCPL.

Developers haven't "lost the plot", we never had it in the first place.

Inversely, Clang, LLDB, jq, fzf, loc are modern projects perfectly in line with the author's notion of a good name. "mise-en-place" is the perfect metaphor for what mise does.

replies(16): >>46239266 #>>46239267 #>>46239293 #>>46239675 #>>46239818 #>>46239903 #>>46240006 #>>46240043 #>>46240475 #>>46240516 #>>46240745 #>>46240858 #>>46240981 #>>46240986 #>>46242271 #>>46242669 #
1. port11 ◴[12 Dec 25 09:10 UTC] No.46242271[source]▶
I agree we never had it in the first place, and that it ultimately doesn't add up to much. It seems like just a familiarity problem.

If I'm diagnosing something at 2AM, I don't care whether my database queries were written with Zapatos or PG-ORM, even if the latter is clearer. As long as you use the tools, you know what they do.