←back to thread

311 points todsacerdoti | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.597s | source
1. girvo ◴[] No.46241465[source]
> Same thing applies to other fields like chemical engineering, where people there maintain even stricter discipline. IUPAC nomenclature ensures that 2,2,4-trimethylpentane describes exactly one molecule. No chemist wakes up and decides to call it “Steve” because Steve is a funny name and they think it’ll make their paper more approachable.

This so isn't important, but this just isn't true at least in chemistry. Plenty of molecules have names that aren't IUPAC based, but instead are based on prefixes/suffixes that are common to the field (more in pharmacological chemistry but not just!)

replies(2): >>46241551 #>>46241559 #
2. amoshebb ◴[] No.46241551[source]
https://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/sillymolecules/sillymols.htm
3. tgv ◴[] No.46241559[source]
And don't isomers share their name? And isotopes don't change the name either, I think?
replies(1): >>46242960 #
4. gottheUIblues ◴[] No.46242960[source]
Except protium, deuterium and tritium