←back to thread

Programmers and software developers lost the plot on naming their tools

(larr.net)
311 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:06 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pdpi ◴[12 Dec 25 00:03 UTC] No.46239164[source]▶
GNU's version of Yacc is called Bison. Pine Is Not Elm (even though that was never an official acronym). UNIX was UNICS which was a pun on MULTICS. I couldn't for the life of me tell you what dd stands for. nano is a copy of pico which was the "PIne COmposer". Postfix is a completely opaque portmanteau of post (as in mail) and "bug fix". C++ is "C incremented", and C is the successor of B, which is the successor of BCPL.

Developers haven't "lost the plot", we never had it in the first place.

Inversely, Clang, LLDB, jq, fzf, loc are modern projects perfectly in line with the author's notion of a good name. "mise-en-place" is the perfect metaphor for what mise does.

replies(16): >>46239266 #>>46239267 #>>46239293 #>>46239675 #>>46239818 #>>46239903 #>>46240006 #>>46240043 #>>46240475 #>>46240516 #>>46240745 #>>46240858 #>>46240981 #>>46240986 #>>46242271 #>>46242669 #
kazinator ◴[12 Dec 25 03:20 UTC] No.46240516[source]▶
The only thing that's different between the era when Bison as named and now is the proliferation. There is vastly more shit in open source with the cute names. Back then, one person could keep all the cute names for everything related to C and Unix in their head.
replies(1): >>46241238 #
1. Suppafly ◴[12 Dec 25 05:46 UTC] No.46241238[source]▶
>The only thing that's different between the era when Bison as named and now is the proliferation. There is vastly more shit in open source with the cute names.

I personally think that's a pretty good idea for coming up with better names instead of cute names now.