←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1053 points atgctg | 1 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
agentifysh ◴[11 Dec 25 22:21 UTC] No.46238067[source]▶
Looks like they've begun censoring posts at r/Codex and not allowing complaint threads so here is my honest take:

- It is faster which is appreciated but not as fast as Opus 4.5

- I see no changes, very little noticeable improvements over 5.1

- I do not see any value in exchange for +40% in token costs

All in all I can't help but feel that OpenAI is facing an existential crisis. Gemini 3 even when its used from AI Studio offers close to ChatGPT Pro performance for free. Anthropic's Claude Code $100/month is tough to beat. I am using Codex with the $40 credits but there's been a silent increase in token costs and usage limitations.

replies(3): >>46238965 #>>46240393 #>>46241715 #
AstroBen ◴[11 Dec 25 23:43 UTC] No.46238965[source]▶
Did you notice much improvement going from Gemini 2.5 to 3? I didn't

I just think they're all struggling to provide real world improvements

replies(9): >>46239052 #>>46239296 #>>46239714 #>>46240131 #>>46240302 #>>46240549 #>>46240983 #>>46241460 #>>46244022 #
1. dudeinhawaii ◴[12 Dec 25 04:52 UTC] No.46240983[source]▶
I noticed a quite noticeable improvement to the point where I made it my go-to model for questions. Coding-wise, not so much. As an intelligent model, writing up designs, investigations, general exploration/research tasks, it's top notch.