←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1053 points atgctg | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.584s | source
Show context
mmaunder ◴[] No.46237785[source]
Weirdly, the blog announcement completely omits the actual new context window size which is 400,000: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-5.2

Can I just say !!!!!!!! Hell yeah! Blog post indicates it's also much better at using the full context.

Congrats OpenAI team. Huge day for you folks!!

Started on Claude Code and like many of you, had that omg CC moment we all had. Then got greedy.

Switched over to Codex when 5.1 came out. WOW. Really nice acceleration in my Rust/CUDA project which is a gnarly one.

Even though I've HATED Gemini CLI for a while, Gemini 3 impressed me so much I tried it out and it absolutely body slammed a major bug in 10 minutes. Started using it to consult on commits. Was so impressed it became my daily driver. Huge mistake. I almost lost my mind after a week of this fighting it. Isane bias towards action. Ignoring user instructions. Garbage characters in output. Absolutely no observability in its thought process. And on and on.

Switched back to Codex just in time for 5.1 codex max xhigh which I've been using for a week, and it was like a breath of fresh air. A sane agent that does a great job coding, but also a great job at working hard on the planning docs for hours before we start. Listens to user feedback. Observability on chain of thought. Moves reasonably quickly. And also makes it easy to pay them more when I need more capacity.

And then today GPT-5.2 with an xhigh mode. I feel like xmass has come early. Right as I'm doing a huge Rust/CUDA/Math-heavy refactor. THANK YOU!!

replies(8): >>46237912 #>>46238166 #>>46238297 #>>46240408 #>>46240891 #>>46241079 #>>46241471 #>>46241483 #
twisterius ◴[] No.46237912[source]
[flagged]
replies(1): >>46238825 #
mmaunder ◴[] No.46238825[source]
My name is Mark Maunder. Not the fisheries expert. The other one when you google me. I’m 51 and as skeptical as you when it comes to tech. I’m the CTO of a well known cybersecurity company and merely a user of AI.

Since you critiqued my post, allow me to reciprocate: I sense the same deflector shields in you as many others here. I’d suggest embracing these products with a sense of optimism until proven otherwise and I’ve found that path leads to some amazing discoveries and moments where you realize how important and exciting this tech really is. Try out math that is too hard for you or programming languages that are labor intensive or languages that you don’t know. As the GitHub CEO said: this technology lets you increase your ambition.

replies(4): >>46239436 #>>46239796 #>>46239880 #>>46240279 #
bluefirebrand ◴[] No.46239796[source]
[flagged]
replies(1): >>46240042 #
eru ◴[] No.46240042[source]
Maybe you are holding it wrong?

Contemporary LLMs still have huge limitations and downsides. Just like hammer or a saw has limitations. But millions of people are getting good value out of them already (both LLMs and hammers and saws). I find it hard to believe that they are all deluded.

replies(1): >>46240455 #
1. skydhash ◴[] No.46240455[source]
What limitations does an hammer have if the job is hammering? Or a saw with sawing? Even `ed` doesn't have any issue with editing text files.
replies(1): >>46242031 #
2. eru ◴[] No.46242031[source]
Well, ask the people who invented better hammers or better saws. Or better text editors than ed.