←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 1 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:04 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sigmar ◴[11 Dec 25 18:39 UTC] No.46235197[source]▶
Are there any specifics about how this was trained? Especially when 5.1 is only a month old. I'm a little skeptical of benchmarks these days and wish they put this up on llmarena

edit: noticed 5.2 is ranked in the webdev arena (#2 tied with gemini-3.0-pro), but not yet in text arena (last update 22hrs ago)

replies(2): >>46235312 #>>46235510 #
emp17344 ◴[11 Dec 25 18:57 UTC] No.46235510[source]▶
I’m extremely skeptical because of all those articles claiming OpenAI was freaking out about Gemini - now it turns out they just casually had a better model ready to go? I don’t buy it.
replies(4): >>46235534 #>>46236858 #>>46239622 #>>46240400 #
1. robots0only ◴[12 Dec 25 03:01 UTC] No.46240400[source]▶
how do you know this is a better model? I wouldn't take any of the numbers at face value especially when all they have done is more/better post-training and thus the base pre-trained model capabilities is still the same. The model may just elicit some of the benchmark capabilities better. You really need to spend time using the model to come to any reliable conclusions.