←back to thread

319 points doctoboggan | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bjord ◴[] No.46235138[source]
is everyone designing their own silicon getting so much additional them-specific utility out of it that it's actually worth it?
replies(6): >>46235215 #>>46235434 #>>46235625 #>>46236036 #>>46237423 #>>46237737 #
darth_avocado ◴[] No.46235215[source]
Rivian has a huge interest in being the outsourcer for legacy automakers. They’re not able to sell $100k cars enough and even with the promised R2, they probably will only be a small-ish player in the EV market. Their CEO recognizes how crazy good Chinese EVs are and currently they’re not even a competitor for Tesla.

But, VW is willing to pay $5B for their software platform. I think they want to extend that to being able to sell custom chips and “AI” capabilities, whatever that means.

replies(1): >>46235424 #
igor47 ◴[] No.46235424[source]
Which honestly is crazy to me. I have a Rivian, and to say the software is disappointing would be an understatement. There are heisenbugs galore; some examples:

* Doors refuse to open

* Lose the ability to control media playback using any controls

* Any button in the UI just opens and closes the windows

Granted, I'm a server side/backend engineer mostly, and I don't know much about writing software/firmware for a very hostile emf environment. But if any project I worked on had bugs like this, fixed at the rate they're fixed on Rivian, I would assume a badly flawed architecture or non existent technical leadership

Yet VW paid billions for this very software. I can't imagine how bad it must've been on their own stack that they gave up and bought this other seemingly broken stack

replies(4): >>46235507 #>>46235729 #>>46239649 #>>46242211 #
1. mbesto ◴[] No.46239649[source]
I own a Rivian too, and previously owned a Tesla. While I too have my gripes about the UX on the Rivian, it still beats the cr*p out of a Tesla.