←back to thread

242 points simonebrunozzi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
analogpixel ◴[] No.46237814[source]
I've been noticing lately, at least for myself, that useful technology stopped happening like 10-20 years ago. If all you could use was tech from 2000 and before you would have a pretty stable stack that just worked (without a monthly subscription.)

There is also this article today: https://jon.recoil.org/blog/2025/12/an-svg-is-all-you-need.h... about how great good ol' svg is. And then every recurring article about using RSS instead of all the other siloed products.

textfiles, makefiles, perl, php, rss, text based email, news groups, irc, icq, vim/emacs, sed, awk; all better than the crap they have spawned that is supposed to be "better".

Out of curiosity, what technology in the past 5 years do you use that you actually find better than something from 20 years ago?

replies(16): >>46237898 #>>46238286 #>>46238745 #>>46238841 #>>46238842 #>>46239106 #>>46239449 #>>46239849 #>>46239850 #>>46239910 #>>46240493 #>>46240958 #>>46241408 #>>46241498 #>>46241632 #>>46242641 #
1. abraxas ◴[] No.46238842[source]
Actually I'll go against the grain here in saying this but I do find LLMs quite useful for a number of tasks. However you won't find an argument that the first two decades of the 21st century were mostly a waste of time in terms of what was built and how little the envelope got pushed outside machine learning. As an old backend developer I find the rise and fall of the nosql mania particularly infuriating.