←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.627s | source
1. tpurves ◴[] No.46238077[source]
Undoubtedly each new model from OpenAi has numerous training and orchestration improvements etc.

But how much of each product they release also just a factor of how much they are willing to spend on inference per query in order to stay competitive?

I always wonder how much is technical change vs turning a knob up and down on hardware and power consumption.

GTP5.0 for example seemed like a lot of changes more for OpenAI's internal benefit (terser responses, dynamic 'auto' mode to scale down thinking when not required etc.)

Wondering if GPT5.2 is also case of them in 'code red mode' just turning what they already have up to 11 as a fastest way to respond to fiercer competion.

replies(1): >>46240315 #
2. simonsarris ◴[] No.46240315[source]
I always liked the definition of technology as "doing more with less". 100 oxen replaced by 1 gallon of diesel, etc.

That it costs more does suggest it's "doing more with more", at least.

replies(1): >>46241965 #
3. psychoslave ◴[] No.46241965[source]
Good luck with reproducing and eating diesel like can be done with oxen and related species.

Humanity won't be able to tap into this highly compressed energy stock that was generated through processes taking literally geological scales time to bed achieved.

That is, technology is more about what alternative tradeoffs can we leverage on to organize differently with resources at hand.

Frugality can definitely be a possible way to shape the technologies we want to deploy. But it's not all possible technologies, just a subset.

Also better technology is not necessarily bringing societies to morale and well-being excellency. Improving technology for efficient genocides for example is going to bring human disaster as obvious outcome, even if it's done in a manner that is the most green, zero-carbon emissions and growing more forests delivered beyond expectations of the specifications.