←back to thread

298 points sangeeth96 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
tagraves ◴[] No.46237728[source]
It's really concerning that the biggest, most eye-grabbing part of this posting is the note with the following: "It’s common for critical CVEs to uncover follow‑up vulnerabilities."

Trying to justify the CVE before fully explaining the scope of the CVE, who is affected, or how to mitigate it -- yikes.

replies(8): >>46237817 #>>46237826 #>>46237920 #>>46238009 #>>46238017 #>>46238302 #>>46239090 #>>46241026 #
1. rickhanlonii ◴[] No.46238017[source]
Thanks for the feedback, I adjusted it here so the first note is related to the impacted versions:

https://github.com/reactjs/react.dev/pull/8195

replies(1): >>46238329 #
2. tagraves ◴[] No.46238329[source]
I appreciate the follow up! I think it looks great now and doesn’t read as defensively anymore!
replies(1): >>46238791 #
3. rickhanlonii ◴[] No.46238791[source]
Yeah agreed, thanks again for the feedback. The priority here is clear disclosure and upgrade steps.