←back to thread

347 points iamnothere | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom

Also: We built a resource hub to fight back against age verification https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/age-verification-comin...
Show context
pksebben ◴[] No.46236900[source]
This keeps coming up and we keep having the same debates about what Age Verification isn't.

For the folks in the back row:

Age Verification isn't about Kids or Censorship, It's about Surveillance

Age Verification isn't about Kids or Censorship, It's about Surveillance

Age Verification isn't about Kids or Censorship, It's about Surveillance

Without even reaching for my tinfoil hat, the strategy at work here is clear [0 1 2]. If we have to know that you're not a minor, then we also have to know who you are so we can make any techniques to obfuscate that illegal. By turning this from "keep an eye on your kids" to "prove you're not a kid" they've created the conditions to make privacy itself illegal.

VPNs are next. Then PGP. Then anything else that makes it hard for them to know who you are, what you say, and who you say it to.

Please, please don't fall into the trap and start discussing whether or not this is going to be effective to protect kids. It isn't, and that isn't the point.

0 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/lawmakers-want-ban-vpn...

1 https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/vpn-usage...

2 https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-09-15/debates/57714...

replies(14): >>46236954 #>>46237349 #>>46237480 #>>46238016 #>>46238148 #>>46238925 #>>46240138 #>>46240141 #>>46240546 #>>46240662 #>>46240975 #>>46241941 #>>46242412 #>>46243136 #
thinkingtoilet ◴[] No.46236954[source]
I am someone who is very privacy focused. I've literally never had a social media account on any platform and I'm 42. From day one of facebook, I never wanted my information online. Like many here, I'm deeply concerned about privacy and surveillance.

In real life, we think age verification is a good thing. Kids shouldn't buy porn. Teenagers shouldn't get into bars. etc... There has to be room somewhere for reasonable discussion about making sure children do not have access to things they shouldn't. I think it's important to note, that complete dismissal of this idea only turns away your allies and hurts our cause in the long run.

replies(7): >>46237065 #>>46237254 #>>46237430 #>>46237509 #>>46237511 #>>46238172 #>>46238205 #
raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46237509[source]
In the online world you can’t make sure of anything. Florida for instance requires age verification for porn sites. Guess how many mainstream sites not based in the US are completely ignoring the law and guess how many others are easily accessible via a VPN? If you guessed the sum total of both is less than 100%, you would be wrong - and even that is tilted toward sites that just ignored it.

The one thing you can control is your childs access through their device using parental controls.

I can absolutely guarantee you that any teenager can easily get access to weed, cigarettes and alcohol despite the laws and definitely can use a VPN. It only takes one smart kid to show them how.

replies(1): >>46237805 #
delusional ◴[] No.46237805[source]
> I can absolutely guarantee you that any teenager can easily get access to weed, cigarettes and alcohol

Is you argument then that we shouldn't age gate those things in reality either? Would you suggest that teenagers smoke and drink just as much as they would have had it been legal to sell to minors?

Laws don't just exist to stop you, they also exist to shape society. They exist as signals for what we deem appropriate behavior.

replies(1): >>46237960 #
1. raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46237960[source]
So we make meaningless laws that inconsistently enforced? What do you think happens when little Johnny is caught with weed in his car in a 95% White high income school district vs little Jerome in a 95% Black school district?

Also how much “shaping of society” do you expect to happen when you pass a law that no one respects?

How many kids do you think a law is going to stop from going to the porn sites that completely ignored the law?

How many kids say “I really want to smoke weed but it’s illegally so I won’t do it”?

replies(2): >>46238086 #>>46238180 #
2. delusional ◴[] No.46238086[source]
> How many kids say “I really want to smoke weed but it’s illegally so I won’t do it”?

I think it's generally accepted that marijuana use increases after legalization. So yes.

replies(2): >>46238249 #>>46238436 #
3. iamnothere ◴[] No.46238180[source]
Laws that nobody respects lead to lack of respect for the law as a whole.
4. raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46238249[source]
Not according to the CDC with kids

https://www.mpp.org/issues/legalization/adult-use-legalizati...

replies(1): >>46241441 #
5. pksebben ◴[] No.46238436[source]
You would think so, but DARE increased adolescent usage of some drugs while having little to no effect on others.

Turns out being illegal isn't as much of a disincentive as being uncool. If your parents are smoking it...

replies(2): >>46238701 #>>46241451 #
6. raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46238701{3}[source]
Nancy Reagan: Don’t sniff glue to get high.

Kids: You can sniff glue and get high!!!

7. delusional ◴[] No.46241441{3}[source]
My guy, this is making the opposite argument from what you think:

"On the illegal market, no one is checking IDs before selling marijuana. When and where cannabis is illegal, high schoolers often sell cannabis to their peers. In contrast, licensed cannabis stores have overwhelming compliance with age-gating."

It has indeed not increased the cannabis use of kids, but that would also still be illegal. That study is an argument that age gating works.

8. delusional ◴[] No.46241451{3}[source]
We have newer and more relevant data than DARE.