←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 2 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:04 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
breakingcups ◴[11 Dec 25 18:37 UTC] No.46235173[source]▶
Is it me, or did it still get at least three placements of components (RAM and PCIe slots, plus it's DisplayPort and not HDMI) in the motherboard image[0] completely wrong? Why would they use that as a promotional image?

0: https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/6lyujQxhZDnOMruN3f...

replies(10): >>46235244 #>>46235267 #>>46236405 #>>46236591 #>>46237241 #>>46239493 #>>46240735 #>>46241534 #>>46241550 #>>46241781 #
tedsanders ◴[11 Dec 25 18:44 UTC] No.46235267[source]▶
Yep, the point we wanted to make here is that GPT-5.2's vision is better, not perfect. Cherrypicking a perfect output would actually mislead readers, and that wasn't our intent.
replies(9): >>46235823 #>>46236007 #>>46236072 #>>46236155 #>>46236158 #>>46236250 #>>46236355 #>>46238538 #>>46241716 #
1. arscan ◴[11 Dec 25 19:34 UTC] No.46236072[source]▶
I think you may have inadvertently misled readers in a different way. I feel misled after not catching the errors myself, assuming it was broadly correct, and then coming across this observation here. Might be worth mentioning this is better but still inaccurate. Just a bit of feedback, I appreciate you are willing to show non-cherry-picked examples and are engaging with this question here.

Edit: As mentioned by @tedsanders below, the post was edited to include clarifying language such as: “Both models make clear mistakes, but GPT‑5.2 shows better comprehension of the image.”

replies(1): >>46236436 #
2. tedsanders ◴[11 Dec 25 20:06 UTC] No.46236436[source]▶
Thanks for the feedback - I agree our text doesn't make the models' mistakes clear enough. I'll make some small edits now, though it might take a few minutes to appear.