Most active commenters
  • testing22321(3)

←back to thread

319 points doctoboggan | 16 comments | | HN request time: 0.239s | source | bottom
Show context
TulliusCicero ◴[] No.46235375[source]
Autonomy subscriptions are how things are going to go, I called this a long time ago. It makes too much sense in terms of continuous development and operations/support to not have a subscription -- and subscriptions will likely double as insurance at some point in the future (once the car is driving itself 100% of the time, and liability is always with the self driving stack anyway).

Of course, people won't like this, I'm not exactly enthused either, but the alternative would be a corporation constantly providing -- for free -- updates and even support if your car gets into an accident or stuck. That doesn't really make sense from a business perspective.

replies(18): >>46235819 #>>46235936 #>>46235949 #>>46236024 #>>46236150 #>>46236188 #>>46236255 #>>46237451 #>>46237487 #>>46238071 #>>46238397 #>>46238855 #>>46239572 #>>46240212 #>>46240694 #>>46242103 #>>46242505 #>>46242708 #
1. stavros ◴[] No.46235936[source]
Why would I own a car when I can Waymo one?
replies(7): >>46235978 #>>46236100 #>>46236106 #>>46236148 #>>46236163 #>>46240625 #>>46242140 #
2. mulderc ◴[] No.46235978[source]
I’m with you but there are plenty of places where public transit is superior to driving and people still drive.
3. nradov ◴[] No.46236100[source]
My cars are more than just transportation. They're mobile storage lockers where I can keep my stuff reasonably secure. They're a place to sit warm and dry while I wait for something else. They're (semi) private changing rooms where I can put on my cycling kit. Regardless of who does the driving I'll never give up owning (or at least leasing) my own private cars.
4. Rebelgecko ◴[] No.46236106[source]
I don't know you or your situation, but many people (including the idealized version of Rivian's target market) like going places that Waymo currently doesn't. There's also tradeoffs with cost, wait time, # of passengers, cargo, etc. Some people may also want to automate "boring" driving while still having the option to do "fun" driving
5. paxys ◴[] No.46236148[source]
Why do people own cars when they can just Uber?
replies(1): >>46236233 #
6. TulliusCicero ◴[] No.46236163[source]
Having your stuff in it already, it's always available immediately (for you), not needing to worry as much about getting it dirty at the beach or with a dog, going to remote places where calling a Waymo may be infeasible or would take a really long time. Probably also cheaper if you drive really frequently.
7. testing22321 ◴[] No.46236233[source]
Because it’s not convenient enough, and too expensive.

Fix those two and personal car ownership will plummet in many places.

Many people don’t want to own a car, pay for insurance, gas, tires, oil changes, parking, washing etc.

Car ownership sucks horribly for most people, it’s just currently the best option. That will change.

replies(3): >>46236401 #>>46239048 #>>46239062 #
8. paxys ◴[] No.46236401{3}[source]
And why do you think Waymo will fix all of this?
replies(2): >>46236801 #>>46238607 #
9. testing22321 ◴[] No.46236801{4}[source]
I don’t particularly think that.

Someone will, I don’t know who. Soon.

10. llbeansandrice ◴[] No.46238607{4}[source]
This is better solved by leveraging more traditional forms of transportation. Making biking, walking, and various forms of transit easier, safer, and more effective. Cars, whether self-driving or not, are in direct opposition to this.

I'm sure they could be useful to folks that have the specific use-case for it, but the vast vast majority of trips in a person's day-to-day are better solved by robust multi-modal options and public transit. The benefit there is that less drivers means that traffic is actually better for everyone.

replies(1): >>46239349 #
11. ◴[] No.46239048{3}[source]
12. ks2048 ◴[] No.46239062{3}[source]
Almost all these points apply ride hailing with or without driver-less.

How do Waymo prices compare to Uber where Waymo exists?

13. testing22321 ◴[] No.46239349{5}[source]
I agree with you broadly in principle, but sadly cities in North America have been built for cars, and so they are by far the best way to get around
replies(1): >>46241697 #
14. jen20 ◴[] No.46240625[source]
Because lugging around two child seats when you get out at the other end fucking sucks.
15. llbeansandrice ◴[] No.46241697{6}[source]
I actually see this as a benefit! Cars take up a lot of space and so now there exists massive right of ways that can be used and modified for other transit modes. Take a lane away from personal cars and dedicate it to buses so they can run faster and avoid traffic. Remove some street parking spots and create a protected bike lane or a street market or something else. The extra space can be a huge boon. It’s pavement, basically a blank canvas imo.
16. m463 ◴[] No.46242140[source]
If you want to leave the waymo boundaries?