Most active commenters
  • spudlyo(4)

←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 13 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
zug_zug ◴[] No.46235131[source]
For me the last remaining killer feature of ChatGPT is the quality of the voice chat. Do any of the competitors have something like that?
replies(15): >>46235139 #>>46235151 #>>46235193 #>>46235277 #>>46235779 #>>46236133 #>>46236236 #>>46236283 #>>46236341 #>>46236399 #>>46236665 #>>46236951 #>>46237061 #>>46237082 #>>46237617 #
1. websiteapi ◴[] No.46235779[source]
gemini live is a thing - never tried chaptgpt, are they not similar?
replies(2): >>46235984 #>>46236261 #
2. jeanlucas ◴[] No.46235984[source]
no.
replies(2): >>46236073 #>>46236152 #
3. leaK_u ◴[] No.46236073[source]
how.
replies(1): >>46236120 #
4. CamelCaseName ◴[] No.46236120{3}[source]
I find ChatGPT's voice to text to be the absolute best in the world, nearly perfect.

I have constant frustrations with Gemini voice to text misunderstanding what I'm saying or worse, immediately sending my voice note when I pause or breathe even though I'm midway through a sentence.

5. nickvec ◴[] No.46236152[source]
What? The voice chat is basically identical on ChatGPT and Gemini AFAICT.
6. spudlyo ◴[] No.46236261[source]
Not for my use case. I can open it up, and in restored classical Latin pronunciation say "Hi, my name is X, how are you?" and it will respond (also in Latin) "Hello X, I am well, thanks for asking. I hope you are doing great." Its pronunciation is not great, but intelligible. In the written transcript, it butchers what I say, but its responses look good, although sans macrons indicating phonemic vowel length.

Gemini responds in what I think is Spanish, or perhaps Portuguese.

However I can hand an 8 minute long 48k mono mp3 of a nuanced Latin speaker who nasalizes his vowels, and makes regular use of elision to Gemini-3-pro-preview and it will produce an accurate macronized Latin transcription. It's pretty mind blowing.

replies(1): >>46236534 #
7. Dilettante_ ◴[] No.46236534[source]
I have to ask: What usecase requires you to speak Latin to the llm?
replies(2): >>46236612 #>>46237315 #
8. spudlyo ◴[] No.46236612{3}[source]
I'm a Latin language learner, and part of developing fluency is practicing extemporaneous speech. My dog is a patient listener, but a poor interlocutor. There are Latin language Discord servers where you can speak to people, but I don't quite have the confidence to do that yet. I assume the machine doesn't judge my shitty grammar.
replies(1): >>46236839 #
9. onraglanroad ◴[] No.46236839{4}[source]
Loquerisne Latine?

Non vere, sed intelligere possum.

Ita, mihi est canis qui idipsum facit!

(translated from the Gàidhlig)

replies(1): >>46237022 #
10. spudlyo ◴[] No.46237022{5}[source]
Certe loqui conor, sed saepenumero prave dico; canis meus non turbatus est ;)
11. nineteen999 ◴[] No.46237315{3}[source]
You haven't heard? Latin is the next big wave, after blockchain and AI.
replies(1): >>46237546 #
12. spudlyo ◴[] No.46237546{4}[source]
You laugh, but the global language learning market in 2025 is expected to exceed USD $100 billion, and LLMs IMHO are poised to disrupt the shit out of it.
replies(1): >>46241967 #
13. nineteen999 ◴[] No.46241967{5}[source]
Well sure I can see that happening ... but I can't see latin making a huge comeback unfortunately.