←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 9 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
1. yousif_123123 ◴[11 Dec 25 19:12 UTC] No.46235755[source]▶
Why doesn't OpenAI include comparisons to other models anymore?
replies(3): >>46235921 #>>46235931 #>>46237914 #
2. ftchd ◴[11 Dec 25 19:22 UTC] No.46235921[source]▶
because they probably need to compare pricing too
3. enraged_camel ◴[11 Dec 25 19:23 UTC] No.46235931[source]▶
Because their main competition (Google and Anthropic) have caught up and even started to surpass them, and comparisons would simply drive it home.
replies(1): >>46236230 #
4. IAmNotACellist ◴[11 Dec 25 19:49 UTC] No.46236230[source]▶
Why do they care so much? They're a non-profit dedicated to the betterment of humanity via open access to AI. They have nothing to hide. They have no motivation to lie, or lie by omission.
replies(2): >>46236337 #>>46239458 #
5. koolba ◴[11 Dec 25 19:58 UTC] No.46236337{3}[source]▶
> Why do they care so much? They're a non-profit dedicated to the betterment of humanity via open access to AI.

We're still talking about OpenAI right?

replies(1): >>46237186 #
6. IAmNotACellist ◴[11 Dec 25 21:08 UTC] No.46237186{4}[source]▶
You're not calling Sam Altman a liar, are you?
7. conradkay ◴[11 Dec 25 22:07 UTC] No.46237914[source]▶
Sam Altman posted with a comparison to Gemini 3 and Opus 4.5

https://x.com/sama/status/1999185784012947900

replies(1): >>46238267 #
8. yousif_123123 ◴[11 Dec 25 22:36 UTC] No.46238267[source]▶
I see, thanks for this.
9. kaliqt ◴[12 Dec 25 00:39 UTC] No.46239458{3}[source]▶
They are not a nonprofit at all. Legally, yes. But they are not.