←back to thread

GPT-5.2

(openai.com)
1019 points atgctg | 1 comments | 11 Dec 25 18:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
zug_zug ◴[11 Dec 25 18:34 UTC] No.46235131[source]▶
For me the last remaining killer feature of ChatGPT is the quality of the voice chat. Do any of the competitors have something like that?
replies(15): >>46235139 #>>46235151 #>>46235193 #>>46235277 #>>46235779 #>>46236133 #>>46236236 #>>46236283 #>>46236341 #>>46236399 #>>46236665 #>>46236951 #>>46237061 #>>46237082 #>>46237617 #
Robdel12 ◴[11 Dec 25 18:38 UTC] No.46235193[source]▶
I have found Claude‘s voice chat to be better. I only recently tried it because I liked ChatGPTs enough, but I think I’m going to use Claude going forward. I find myself getting interrupted by ChatGPT a lot whenever I do use it.
replies(1): >>46235258 #
lxgr ◴[11 Dec 25 18:43 UTC] No.46235258[source]▶
Claude’s voice chat isn’t “native” though, is it? It feels like it’s speech-to-text-to-LLM and back.
replies(2): >>46235357 #>>46236680 #
sosodev ◴[11 Dec 25 18:48 UTC] No.46235357[source]▶
You can test it by asking it to: change the pitch of its voice, make specific sounds (like laughter), differentiate between words that are spelled the same but pronounced differently (record and record), etc.
replies(2): >>46235438 #>>46236201 #
lxgr ◴[11 Dec 25 18:53 UTC] No.46235438[source]▶
Good idea, but an external “bolted on” LLM-based TTS would still pass that in many cases, right?
replies(3): >>46235639 #>>46235768 #>>46235803 #
1. barrkel ◴[11 Dec 25 19:04 UTC] No.46235639[source]▶
The model giving it text to speak would have to annotate the text in order for the TTS to add the affect. The TTS wouldn't "remember" such instructions from a speech to text stage previously.