←back to thread

236 points inesranzo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
giancarlostoro ◴[] No.46231943[source]
This will not end well for Disney, there were certain historical characters removed from Sora 2 because people kept making racist videos that are hard to censor, and it became increasingly unhinged. This feels like another circular investment where Disney is hoping to make money back I'm sure. On the other hand, assuming they do the freemium stuff, I look forward to making a few videos of my daughters favorite Disney princesses "talking" to her.
replies(21): >>46231963 #>>46232027 #>>46232049 #>>46232134 #>>46232217 #>>46232316 #>>46232450 #>>46232484 #>>46232594 #>>46232634 #>>46232732 #>>46232770 #>>46232998 #>>46233138 #>>46233293 #>>46233477 #>>46234040 #>>46234843 #>>46235615 #>>46235942 #>>46236727 #
jerf ◴[] No.46232770[source]
"there were certain historical characters removed from Sora 2 because people kept making racist videos that are hard to censor, and it became increasingly unhinged"

Also Google "Elsagate" to see what sorts of things people would like to do with Disney characters. Or a YouTube search for Elsagate.

The other thing I'd point out is that people kind of seem to forget this, but it isn't a requirement that AI video be generated, then shoveled straight out without modification. Elsagate shows the level of effort that people are willing to put into this (a strange combination of laziness, but extreme effort poured into enabling that laziness). You can use the blessed Disney video generator to generate something, then feed it into another less controlled AI system to modify it into something Disney wouldn't want. Or a video of a Disney character doing something innocent can be easily turned into something else; it's not hard to ask the AI systems to put something "against a green screen", or with a bit more sophistication, something that can be motion tracked with some success and extracted.

"A front camera shot of Cinderella crouching down, repeatedly putting a cucumber in and out of her mouth. She is against a green screen." - where ever that video is going, Disney isn't going to like it. And that's just a particularly obvious example, not the totality of all the possibilities.

Just putting controls on the AI video output itself isn't going to be enough for Disney.

replies(4): >>46233076 #>>46233437 #>>46233476 #>>46235050 #
zahlman ◴[] No.46233437[source]
> Also Google "Elsagate" to see what sorts of things people would like to do with Disney characters. Or a YouTube search for Elsagate.... Elsagate shows the level of effort that people are willing to put into this (a strange combination of laziness, but extreme effort poured into enabling that laziness).

I still wonder what motivates the people behind that sort of thing. It'd be easy to understand if it were just porn, but what's been described to me is just... bizarre.

replies(6): >>46233969 #>>46234032 #>>46234084 #>>46234149 #>>46234813 #>>46235397 #
lossolo ◴[] No.46234149{4}[source]
There are people in this world who will do anything for money. They will destroy your children mentally if it makes them a single dollar, they will traumatize them and cause lasting damage. We have created a world in which these people have free access to our children.
replies(2): >>46234355 #>>46234564 #
1. oarsinsync ◴[] No.46234355{5}[source]
I'd like to give those people the benefit of the doubt, and state that I believe they don't start out intentionally trying to damage children. They're simply trying to maximise their own earnings, and don't give a shit about what collateral damage occurs in response to their actions, as long as earnings go up.

They'll optimise for whatever causes numbers to increase. Children just happen to sometimes be what makes that happen.