←back to thread

236 points inesranzo | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
gekoxyz ◴[] No.46232125[source]
I never thought this could happen, especially after the "Ghibli scandal". OpenAI has pulled a majestic business move. They got to allow people to generate Disney characters without issue AND will give 1 billion dollars to OpenAI?

Now the internet will be flooded by Disney character's videos, and since they don't have to pretend they didn't train on their intellectual property anymore I'm really curious to see where this will bring us.

We should rethink copyright btw.

replies(3): >>46232167 #>>46238557 #>>46241525 #
Hamuko ◴[] No.46232167[source]
>Now the internet will be flooded by Disney character's videos

How is Disney okay with this anyway? They've sent their lawyers after daycare centers who dared to paint a picture of a Disney character on their walls. Why are they suddenly going to ignore me prompting a video of Winnie the Pooh hitting the bong?

replies(8): >>46232215 #>>46237497 #>>46237607 #>>46238261 #>>46238370 #>>46238873 #>>46239848 #>>46240928 #
afavour ◴[] No.46232215{3}[source]
Because they didn't get any money from the daycare and they will get money from OpenAI when you make your Sora video. That's all there is to it.
replies(2): >>46232279 #>>46237366 #
Hamuko ◴[] No.46232279{4}[source]
I have a feeling that the long-term economics of this don't really work. OpenAI is burning money and Altman has already gone out in public saying how Sora-generated content is being made in large volumes for little audience.

>People are generating much more than we expected per user, and a lot of videos are being generated for very small audiences.

If OpenAI is going to pay Disney money for Winnie the Pooh smoking crack, I get the feeling that the money is going to come not from Sora profits but from companies that invested in OpenAI. Companies like Disney. Not that Sora is going to generate any profit if I can generate a video for free and I then post it on Discord instead.

replies(3): >>46232610 #>>46237435 #>>46238191 #
1. afavour ◴[] No.46232610{5}[source]
Yes, that's what makes Disney investing in OpenAI as part of this so confusing to me. Sign a licensing deal that means OpenAI pays you every time someone uses your character? Absolutely. Who cares if they're burning cash, as long as you get your payday it's all good. But investing in the company means their cash burning is your problem too. I don't know why you'd do it.
replies(1): >>46237391 #
2. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.46237391[source]
The only explanation is if they think they can juice their stock by 2 billion and then whoever is on the ship jumps before the crash.

Sounds like Iger has his finger on the eject button. How much stock has he announced to be cashing out over 2026?

replies(1): >>46238106 #
3. sheeshe ◴[] No.46238106[source]
It’s not that.

It’s ego and desperation for one last hurrah. Disney has a history of being a corporate governance nightmare - which Iger ironically contributed toward fixing. He’s undoing all that now.