←back to thread

386 points italophil | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chinathrow ◴[] No.46228736[source]
> U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday ordered diplomats to return to using Times New Roman font in official communications, calling his predecessor Antony Blinken's decision to adopt Calibri a "wasteful" diversity move, according to an internal department cable seen by Reuters.

What a waste of government time and spending.

replies(9): >>46229084 #>>46229345 #>>46229486 #>>46229932 #>>46230134 #>>46231399 #>>46231787 #>>46231999 #>>46233031 #
JKCalhoun ◴[] No.46231787[source]
"wasteful diversity move"

Wild. I'm curious now if someone has an ordered list of fonts from the gayest to the straightest.

replies(1): >>46232278 #
nxor[dead post] ◴[] No.46232278[source]
[flagged]
1. mgkimsal ◴[] No.46232602{3}[source]
> if a person is visually impaired, why wouldn't they have tools at their disposal to make things readable?

If it's on a screen in a browser, probably. If it's printed, or on a display not under a reader's control, probably not.

FWIW, I'm partially split. I generally prefer sans-serif overall - have for decades. I think I slightly prefer serif for some printed material visually, but... when I actually have to engage and read it, for long periods, I think I tend to opt for sans-serif. Noticed this on my kindle years ago, and kindle reader now - I usually swap to sans-serif options (I think it's been my default for a while).