←back to thread

236 points inesranzo | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
giancarlostoro ◴[] No.46231943[source]
This will not end well for Disney, there were certain historical characters removed from Sora 2 because people kept making racist videos that are hard to censor, and it became increasingly unhinged. This feels like another circular investment where Disney is hoping to make money back I'm sure. On the other hand, assuming they do the freemium stuff, I look forward to making a few videos of my daughters favorite Disney princesses "talking" to her.
replies(21): >>46231963 #>>46232027 #>>46232049 #>>46232134 #>>46232217 #>>46232316 #>>46232450 #>>46232484 #>>46232594 #>>46232634 #>>46232732 #>>46232770 #>>46232998 #>>46233138 #>>46233293 #>>46233477 #>>46234040 #>>46234843 #>>46235615 #>>46235942 #>>46236727 #
1. ipaddr ◴[] No.46232134[source]
This might end well for Disney. This provides a different marketing angle to bring in younger people to Disney. The filters will block a lot of the sexual violence content. The original cartoons are deemed racist by some so this won't open a door already opened.

But it is another circular investment to throw on the AI bubble pile.

replies(2): >>46232393 #>>46233085 #
2. smith7018 ◴[] No.46232393[source]
Is it circular, though? Is an AI company giving Disney $1B?
replies(1): >>46233196 #
3. thrance ◴[] No.46233085[source]
The "original cartoons" are super tame compared to the heinous shit you can easily find on Sora.
4. andrew_lettuce ◴[] No.46233196[source]
If just the news of the deal boosts Disney stock enough to pay for the deal, then yes. Or if it boosts OpenAI valuation because they now have Disney IP enough to pay off on Disney's investment, it is basically Disney producing content indirectly.