←back to thread

386 points italophil | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chinathrow ◴[] No.46228736[source]
> U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday ordered diplomats to return to using Times New Roman font in official communications, calling his predecessor Antony Blinken's decision to adopt Calibri a "wasteful" diversity move, according to an internal department cable seen by Reuters.

What a waste of government time and spending.

replies(9): >>46229084 #>>46229345 #>>46229486 #>>46229932 #>>46230134 #>>46231399 #>>46231787 #>>46231999 #>>46233031 #
moltopoco ◴[] No.46229486[source]
From the article:

> A cable dated December 9 sent to all U.S. diplomatic posts said that typography shapes the professionalism of an official document and Calibri is informal compared to serif typefaces. > "To restore decorum and professionalism to the Department’s written work products and abolish yet another wasteful DEIA program, the Department is returning to Times New Roman as its standard typeface," the cable said.

I don't read that purely as an "anti-woke" move, why did Reuters only highlight that part and not the bit about professionalism? I do indeed agree that serifs look more authoritative.

replies(4): >>46229749 #>>46229939 #>>46230307 #>>46230622 #
1. Propelloni ◴[] No.46230622[source]
If it is about professionalism, why mention DEIA at all? It's just virtue-signalling. Reuters realized that and pointed it out.
replies(1): >>46232162 #
2. ondra ◴[] No.46233262[source]
> It was Blinken that arbitrarily introduced

The _second paragraph_ of TFA gives a reason for the introduction. Please explain how you came to the conclusion that the change was arbitrary.