Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    386 points italophil | 16 comments | | HN request time: 0.285s | source | bottom
    Show context
    LucasFonts ◴[] No.46229533[source]
    Our studio, LucasFonts, designed Calibri. Here are our CEO Luc(as) de Groot’s thoughts on the matter:

    The decision to abandon Calibri on the grounds of it being a so-called “wasteful diversity font” is both amusing and regrettable. Calibri was specifically designed to enhance readability on modern computer screens and was selected by Microsoft in 2007 to replace Times New Roman as the default font in the Office suite. There were sound reasons for moving away from Times: Calibri performs exceptionally well at small sizes and on standard office monitors, whereas serif fonts like Times New Roman tend to appear more distorted. While serif fonts are well-suited to high-resolution displays, such as those found on modern smartphones, on typical office screens the serifs introduce unnecessary visual noise and can be particularly problematic for users with impaired vision, such as older adults.

    Professional typography can be achieved with both serif and sans-serif fonts. However, Times New Roman—a typeface older than the current president—presents unique challenges. Originally crafted in Great Britain for newspaper printing, Times was optimised for paper, with each letterform meticulously cut and tested for specific sizes. In the digital era, larger size drawings were repurposed as models, resulting in a typeface that appears too thin and sharp when printed at high quality.

    Serif fonts are often perceived as more traditional, but they are also more demanding to use effectively. While a skilled typographer can, in theory, produce excellent results with Times, using it in its default digital form is not considered professional practice.

    Calibri, by contrast, incorporates extensive spacing adjustments and language-specific refinements. The digital version of Times New Roman, developed in the early days of computing, offers only minimal kerning and letter-pair adjustments. This is especially evident in words set in all capitals—such as “CHICAGO”—where the spacing is inconsistent: the letters “HIC” are tightly packed, while “CAG” are spaced too far apart. Microsoft cannot rectify these issues without altering the appearance of existing documents.

    replies(10): >>46229784 #>>46230177 #>>46230521 #>>46230526 #>>46230811 #>>46231066 #>>46231353 #>>46233540 #>>46234054 #>>46234367 #
    1. nabla9 ◴[] No.46230177[source]
    I think we all can agree that Comic Sans MS reflects the current US government best, both spiritually and aesthetically.
    replies(7): >>46230388 #>>46230401 #>>46231862 #>>46231997 #>>46232817 #>>46234151 #>>46238364 #
    2. butchcassidi ◴[] No.46230388[source]
    I would rather see Wingdings.
    replies(2): >>46231222 #>>46237201 #
    3. lo_zamoyski ◴[] No.46230401[source]
    I would say it’s worse than that. Read Plato’s “Republic” and you may come to appreciate a much more expansive appropriateness of Comic Sans, beyond just the current administration.
    replies(1): >>46233715 #
    4. VikingCoder ◴[] No.46231222[source]
    ·puᴉɯ oʇ ǝɯoɔ ʇɐɥʇ sʇuoɟ ɹǝɥʇo ǝɹɐ ǝɹǝɥꓕ
    replies(1): >>46231547 #
    5. lenerdenator ◴[] No.46231547{3}[source]
    That's the official font of the Australian government.
    replies(1): >>46233172 #
    6. nimbius ◴[] No.46231862[source]
    i tend to find the kerning issues noted by the calibri team are moot. most Times New Roman is perfectly legible with careful observation and maybe a fresh cup of covfefe.
    7. adolph ◴[] No.46231997[source]
    Your comment may be in jest but there is some evidence that "easier to read" does not benefit "retain what was read."

      And that brings us back to these ugly fonts. Because their shapes are 
      unfamiliar, because they are less legible, they make the mind work a little 
      harder; the slight frisson of Comic Sans wakes us up or at least prevents us 
      from leaning on the usual efficiencies. “The complex fonts . . . function 
      like an alarm,” Alter writes. They signal “that we need to recruit additional 
      mental resources to overcome that sense of difficulty.”
      
    https://lithub.com/the-ugliness-of-comic-sans-has-a-practica...
    8. ndkap ◴[] No.46232817[source]
    As an aside, I didn't know what Comic Sans looks like, so I searched on Google and it rendered the whole page in that font. I tried with other Fonts too like Arial and Times New Roman, and it did the same there. So cool!
    replies(2): >>46234276 #>>46236686 #
    9. ptdorf ◴[] No.46233172{4}[source]
    You meant: Austria. The lang of Kangaroos.
    10. hilbert42 ◴[] No.46233715[source]
    I have, many times, hence my earlier comment.

    If Rubio read Republic then he's just demonstrated that he'd not have understood it.

    11. amypetrik8 ◴[] No.46234151[source]
    >I think we all can agree that Comic Sans MS reflects the current US government best, both spiritually and aesthetically.

    Honestly when are we going to impeach Trump, he's basically the same Hitler. The worst part is he's proud of that comparison as is much of the right. We were headed to a UBI paradise and it all collapsed into billionaire paradise.

    replies(1): >>46238970 #
    12. tracker1 ◴[] No.46234276[source]
    Very cool... but I can't seem to get it to do so for other fonts I can think of off the top of my head... Inconsolata, Consolas, Fira Code, etc. "Times New Roman" does work as well.

    Would be cool to see google support this for at least all the fonts in Google Fonts' library, since they're already well supported web fonts.

    13. rbanffy ◴[] No.46236686[source]
    Sadly, it doesn't work with the coolest niche fonts... https://www.google.com/search?q=ibm+3270
    14. ◴[] No.46237201[source]
    15. jpster ◴[] No.46238364[source]
    I beg to differ. Wingdings is more like it.
    16. themadturk ◴[] No.46238970[source]
    Maybe when (if?) the Democrats take back the House and Senate in 2026. Right now Congress is solidly right-wing and sees no reason to impeach...nor would a conviction ever happen, even if the trial was held.