←back to thread

386 points italophil | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nelox ◴[] No.46228995[source]
Reuters calling the switch a "font" change instead of a typeface change is troubling, though consistent with a society that now casually refers to all pasta as "spaghetti". A typeface is the design; a font is its specific instance. This is basic knowledge, taught to children, houseplants, and most domesticated goats.

A simple correction would stop this spiral, but Reuters appears committed to forging a bold new era in which terminology is chosen at random, like drawing Scrabble tiles from a bag and declaring them journalism.

replies(6): >>46229011 #>>46229032 #>>46229165 #>>46229263 #>>46229558 #>>46230030 #
1. lil-lugger ◴[] No.46229263[source]
I’m a professional graphic designer, people in the industry use font, type and typeface interchangeably. No one goes “Umm Actually…” you should also tell that to who wrote css, because font-weight doesn’t make sense if a font is already a specific weight. Words mean something specific until they don’t and the meaning changes over time and that’s okay