←back to thread

347 points iamnothere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Also: We built a resource hub to fight back against age verification https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/age-verification-comin...
Show context
1vuio0pswjnm7 ◴[] No.46226006[source]
"SAN FRANCISCO-With ill-advised and dangerous age verification laws proliferating across the United States and around the world, creating surveillance and censorship regimes that will be used to harm both youth and adults, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has launched a new resource hub that will sort through the mess and help"

The surveillance and censorship system is built, administered and maintained by Silicon Valley companies who have adopted this as their "business model". "Monetising" surveillance of other peoples' noncommercial internet use

These Silicon Valley companies have been surveilling internet subscribers for over a decade, relentlessly connecting online identity to offline identity, hell bent on knowing who is accessing what webpage on what website, where they live, what they are interested in, and so on, building detailed advertising profiles (including the age of the ad target) tied to IP addresses, then selling the subscribers out to advertisers and collecting obscene profits (and killing media organisations that hire journalists in the process)

Now these companies are being forced to share some of the data they collect and store

Gosh, who would have forseen such an outcome

These laws are targeting the Silicon Valley companies, not internet subscribers

But the companies want to spin it as an attack on subscribers

The truth is the companies have been attacking subscriber privacy and attempting to gatekeep internet publication^1 for over a decade, in the name of advertising and obscene profits

1. Discourage subscribers from publishing websites and encourage them to create pages on the company's website instead. Centralise internet publication, collect data, perform surveillance and serve advertisements

replies(1): >>46227094 #
1. rixed ◴[] No.46227094[source]
It was bad already, so who cares if that gets worse? Is that the message?

Silicon valley uses that information to sell adds, and sometimes votes. Not great, but I can imagine much worse from a State.