←back to thread

Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

(www.reuters.com)
386 points italophil | 1 comments | 10 Dec 25 00:08 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
WhyOhWhyQ ◴[10 Dec 25 22:35 UTC] No.46224941[source]▶
Is Calibri actually more accessible? Every step of this story seems pointless and fake.
replies(5): >>46224996 #>>46225153 #>>46225174 #>>46225199 #>>46225226 #
legitster ◴[10 Dec 25 22:54 UTC] No.46225153[source]▶
If I remember correctly Microsoft did a bunch of studies back in the day and found the Calibri had some of the best readability across a range of visibility and reading impairments (like dyslexia).

Serif fonts have some readability features of their own, specifically for printed word.

replies(1): >>46226805 #
1. icecube123 ◴[11 Dec 25 02:07 UTC] No.46226805[source]▶
You are correct. Microsoft invested significantly to create a modern properly designed font that is easy to read on a variety of screens, prints clearly and consistently, scales well, and can do italics, bold, etc well.

I think this came out back with Office 2007 or something. I believe Aptos is actually the new next generation font that should generally be considered an enhancement to Calibri.

While Microsoft isnt great at many things, their investment in font design and support is outstanding.