←back to thread

615 points __rito__ | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

Related from yesterday: Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632
Show context
Rperry2174 ◴[] No.46223267[source]
One thing this really highlights to me is how often the "boring" takes end up being the most accurate. The provocative, high-energy threads are usually the ones that age the worst.

If an LLM were acting as a kind of historian revisiting today’s debates with future context, I’d bet it would see the same pattern again and again: the sober, incremental claims quietly hold up, while the hyperconfident ones collapse.

Something like "Lithium-ion battery pack prices fall to $108/kWh" is classic cost-curve progress. Boring, steady, and historically extremely reliable over long horizons. Probably one of the most likely headlines today to age correctly, even if it gets little attention.

On the flip side, stuff like "New benchmark shows top LLMs struggle in real mental health care" feels like high-risk framing. Benchmarks rotate constantly, and “struggle” headlines almost always age badly as models jump whole generations.

I bet theres many "boring but right" takes we overlook today and I wondr if there's a practical way to surface them before hindsight does

replies(8): >>46223430 #>>46223589 #>>46224230 #>>46225719 #>>46226198 #>>46226204 #>>46226759 #>>46227922 #
1. 0manrho ◴[] No.46226759[source]
It's because algorithmic feeds based on "user engagement" rewards antagonism. If your goal is to get eyes on content, being boring, predictable and nuanced is a sure way to get lost in the ever increasing noise.