←back to thread

Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

(www.reuters.com)
386 points italophil | 1 comments | 10 Dec 25 00:08 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
WhyOhWhyQ ◴[10 Dec 25 22:35 UTC] No.46224941[source]▶
Is Calibri actually more accessible? Every step of this story seems pointless and fake.
replies(5): >>46224996 #>>46225153 #>>46225174 #>>46225199 #>>46225226 #
papercrane ◴[10 Dec 25 22:41 UTC] No.46224996[source]▶
One of the reasons Calibri was selected over Times New Roman was it has a lower rate of OCR transcription errors, making documents using it easier for people using screen readers.
replies(2): >>46225285 #>>46227403 #
blueflow ◴[10 Dec 25 23:05 UTC] No.46225285[source]▶
Link on that, as OCR should be more reliable with Times New Roman due to significant serifs.
replies(3): >>46225527 #>>46226162 #>>46227942 #
papercrane ◴[10 Dec 25 23:28 UTC] No.46225527{3}[source]▶
The memo at the time said the serifs can cause OCR issues.

https://x.com/John_Hudson/status/1615486871571935232

replies(1): >>46226222 #
opo ◴[11 Dec 25 00:47 UTC] No.46226222{4}[source]▶
Just because they claimed it, doesn't make it true. OCR and screen reader software in 2023 did not have problems with serifs.
replies(1): >>46226543 #
1. ◴[11 Dec 25 01:26 UTC] No.46226543{5}[source]▶