←back to thread

615 points __rito__ | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

Related from yesterday: Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632
Show context
modeless ◴[] No.46222213[source]
This is a cool idea. I would install a Chrome extension that shows a score by every username on this site grading how well their expressed opinions match what subsequently happened in reality, or the accuracy of any specific predictions they've made. Some people's opinions are closer to reality than others and it's not always correlated with upvotes.

An extension of this would be to grade people on the accuracy of the comments they upvote, and use that to weight their upvotes more in ranking. I would love to read a version of HN where the only upvotes that matter are from people who agree with opinions that turn out to be correct. Of course, only HN could implement this since upvotes are private.

replies(7): >>46222748 #>>46223194 #>>46223649 #>>46224507 #>>46226548 #>>46228558 #>>46229291 #
1. 8organicbits ◴[] No.46223649[source]
The problem seems underspecified; what does it mean for a comment to be accurate? It would seem that comments like "the sun will rise tomorrow" would rank highest, but they aren't surprising.
replies(1): >>46230389 #
2. smeeger ◴[] No.46230389[source]
just because an idea is qualitative doesn't mean its invalid