←back to thread

626 points __rito__ | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.776s | source

Related from yesterday: Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632
1. tptacek ◴[] No.46223130[source]
'pcwalton, I'm coming for you. You're going down.

Kidding aside, the comments it picks out for us are a little random. For instance, this was an A+ predictive thread (it appears to be rating threads and not individual comments):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10703512

But there's just 11 comments, only 1 for me, and it's like a 1-sentence comment.

I do love that my unaccredited-access-to-startup-shares take is on that leaderboard, though.

replies(3): >>46227906 #>>46228813 #>>46231858 #
2. kbenson ◴[] No.46227906[source]
I noticed from reviewing my own entry (which honestly I'm surprised exists) that the idea of what it thinks constitutes a "prediction" is fairly open to interpretation, or at least that adding some nuance to a small aspect in a thread to someone else prediction counts quite heavily. I don't really view how I've participated here over the years in any way as making predictions. I actually thought I had done a fairly good job at not making predictions, by design.
3. n4r9 ◴[] No.46228813[source]
Yeah, I'm having to pinch myself a little here. Another slightly odd example it picked out from your history: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10735398

It's a good comment, but "prescient" isn't a word I'd apply to it. This is more like a list of solid takes. To be fair there probably aren't even that many explicit, correct predictions in one month of comments in 2015.

4. mvkel ◴[] No.46231858[source]
Hilariously, it seems you anticipated this happening and copyrighted your comments. Is karpathy's tool in violation of your copyright?!
replies(1): >>46231935 #
5. tptacek ◴[] No.46231935[source]
Karpathy, I'm coming for you next.