←back to thread

42 points dpcx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CaliforniaKarl ◴[] No.46213764[source]
Huh, I guess it's best to think of each site's NIST NTP servers as 'load-balancers' in front of a single 'application server'.

Fun fact: Per [0], if you provide enough servers, the NTP client can detect a "falseticker" that is not providing accurate time. The number of NTP servers required is `2n+1` where `n≥1`.

Of course, that requires each NTP server use its own time source.

So, note for me: If I want NTP redundancy and I'm using NIST's servers, pick one NTP server from each of NTP's three sites.

[0]: https://support.ntp.org/Support/SelectingOffsiteNTPServers#U...

replies(3): >>46214083 #>>46214290 #>>46222399 #
1. DANmode ◴[] No.46222399[source]
This was implied by them taking the time and effort to establish multiple sites.