←back to thread

Deprecations via warnings don't work for Python libraries

(sethmlarson.dev)
45 points scolby33 | 3 comments | 08 Dec 25 18:13 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hartator ◴[10 Dec 25 17:58 UTC] No.46221036[source]▶
I think they are misreading the situation.

The devil is in the details. It seems `getHeaders` v. `headers` is non-security, non-performance related issue. Why people should spend time fixing these?

replies(2): >>46221216 #>>46223911 #
1. CaliforniaKarl ◴[10 Dec 25 18:11 UTC] No.46221216[source]▶
If you (either directly or from SerpApi) are supporting the urllib3 folks (through a Tidelift subscription), then yes, that is a valid point.

Otherwise, I'd say that's a very brave comment you are making.

replies(2): >>46221607 #>>46221671 #
2. shadowgovt ◴[10 Dec 25 18:38 UTC] No.46221607[source]▶
"Brave" in what sense? It's a legitimate question why an API is having a pattern deprecated and removed for what appears to be pattern reasons.
3. ipaddr ◴[10 Dec 25 18:42 UTC] No.46221671[source]▶
If he gave money valid point if not he must be brave?