←back to thread

473 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.46220095[source]
I'm curious how congestion pricing became a national issue. The strength of conviction people have about this policy–almost either way, but certainly among those against–seems to scale with distance from the city.

Nobody in Idaho gets uppity about New Jersey's tolls. But they have strong, knowledge-free, almost identity-defining opinions about congestion charges.

Is it because it's a policy that's worked in Europe and Asia and is thus seen as foreign? Or because it's New York doing it, so it's branded as a tax, versus market-rate access or whatever we'd be calling it if this were done in Miami?

replies(14): >>46220138 #>>46220140 #>>46220243 #>>46220335 #>>46220405 #>>46220410 #>>46220420 #>>46220553 #>>46220668 #>>46220978 #>>46221390 #>>46221973 #>>46223663 #>>46229483 #
standardUser ◴[] No.46220138[source]
It's because Trump made it one of his obsessions for a period of time, putting it on the MAGA radar.
replies(1): >>46220176 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.46220176[source]
> It's because Trump made it one of his obsessions for a period of time, putting it on the MAGA radar

Had most people outside the tri-state area not heard and formed an opinion about congestion pricig before Trump brought it up?

replies(1): >>46220763 #
1. standardUser ◴[] No.46220763[source]
Why would they? There is virtually no congestion pricing in the US outside of a few major metros and a huge portion of the population live in areas where the lack of density makes the entire idea moot.