←back to thread

473 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
MLgulabio[dead post] ◴[] No.46219499[source]
[flagged]
ceejayoz ◴[] No.46219531[source]
NYC has 8M people and 2M cars. Manhattan has like a 22% car ownership rate, and it's… not the poor people. https://www.hunterurban.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Car-L...

A parking spot will cost you more than rent in some other cities.

replies(1): >>46219671 #
MLgulabio ◴[] No.46219671[source]
This doesn't change my argument at all.

The more money you have, more you benefit from this ruling. Now you can buy a service which was not possible before.

replies(3): >>46219717 #>>46219861 #>>46219900 #
stetrain ◴[] No.46219900[source]
The rich were driving before, and are still driving.

The difference is that now they are paying for that service they were already using, and those funds are going to public transit which serves the majority of New Yorkers especially those with lower incomes.

replies(2): >>46220116 #>>46220229 #
CryptoBanker ◴[] No.46220116[source]
The problem is that no one in NYC, rich or poor, has any confidence in the MTA's ability to properly and efficiently use these funds. This stems from a long history of incompetence and wastefulness by the MTA
replies(2): >>46220191 #>>46220232 #
1. stetrain ◴[] No.46220191[source]
Sounds like a great area to advocate for improvement.