(neal.fun)

2530 points eatonphil | 1 comments | 10 Dec 25 16:02 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

yunwal ◴[10 Dec 25 16:32 UTC] No.46219822[source]▶

>>46219346 (OP) #

I don't understand how the location of a 377 foot tall tree could be kept secret. Wouldn't that type of thing be visible in satellite imagery at the very least?

replies(4): >>46219885 #>>46220042 #>>46220057 #>>46230241 #

1. micromacrofoot ◴[10 Dec 25 16:49 UTC] No.46220042[source]▶

>>46219822 #

There are a lot of 300 foot trees in the general vicinity, so you'd need to actually measure to be precisely sure

↑

Size of Life