←back to thread

472 points Brajeshwar | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.76s | source
Show context
lkbm ◴[] No.46218856[source]
> Particulates issued from tailpipes can aggravate asthma and heart disease and increase the risk of lung cancer and heart attack. Globally, they are a leading risk factor for premature death.

Minor nitpick, but tailpipes aren't the primary source of emissions. The study is about PM2.5[0]. which will chiefly be tires and brake pads. Modern gasoline engines are relatively clean, outside of CO2, though diesel engines spit out a bunch of bad stuff.

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s44407-025-00037-2

replies(15): >>46218921 #>>46218933 #>>46219022 #>>46219122 #>>46219147 #>>46219190 #>>46219382 #>>46219549 #>>46219741 #>>46219841 #>>46219865 #>>46220664 #>>46220784 #>>46220991 #>>46222644 #
throwawaypath ◴[] No.46218933[source]
How do EVs fare in this regard? Brakes are used significantly less, but the additional weight from the batteries chews through tires faster.
replies(9): >>46218960 #>>46219005 #>>46219135 #>>46219195 #>>46219426 #>>46219645 #>>46219731 #>>46219820 #>>46219879 #
jgeada ◴[] No.46219005[source]
Why does everyone immediately pivot to EVs on this subject, instead of (looks around) gargantuan SUVs and trucks everywhere, due to peculiarities of US policies regulating SUVs more leniently than cars on fuel efficiency?
replies(7): >>46219103 #>>46219157 #>>46219663 #>>46219712 #>>46219882 #>>46219960 #>>46220111 #
Angostura ◴[] No.46219103[source]
Because a lot if EV buyers are interested in the environmental impact of their purchase?
replies(2): >>46219111 #>>46219693 #
ceejayoz ◴[] No.46219111[source]
Alternatively: Because fossil fuel companies have a long, long history of astroturfing public opinion to benefit their business.

Same trick with solar farms: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/18/1154867064/solar-power-misinf...

And wind: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-oil-and-gas-ind...

replies(1): >>46219874 #
1. bpt3 ◴[] No.46219874[source]
I see this argument almost exclusively from the fuckcars crowd, because their existing environmental arguments against ICE vehicles don't apply to EVs.

If you're claiming that the oil and gas lobby is facilitating their criticism of any automobile, I hope you're right because that would be hilarious.

replies(1): >>46220023 #
2. ceejayoz ◴[] No.46220023[source]
> I see this argument almost exclusively from the fuckcars crowd...

That's not shocking to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_the_Earth_(US)

> Friends of the Earth U.S. was founded in California in 1969 by environmentalist David Brower after he left the Sierra Club. The organization was launched with the help of Donald Aitken, Jerry Mander and a $200,000 donation from the personal funds of Robert O. Anderson. One of its first major campaigns was the protest of nuclear power, particularly in California.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Orville_Anderson

> Robert Orville Anderson (April 12, 1917 – December 2, 2007) was an American businessman, art collector, and philanthropist who founded [the United States' sixth-largest oil company] Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO).