←back to thread

3338 points keepamovin | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.63s | source
Show context
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.46213179[source]
This is awesome, but minor quibble with the title - "hallucinates" is the wrong verb here. You specifically asked it to make up a 10-year-in-the-future HN frontpage, and that's exactly what it did. "Hallucinates" means when it randomly makes stuff up but purports it to be the truth. If some one asks me to write a story for a creative writing class, and I did, you wouldn't say I "hallucinated" the story.
replies(4): >>46213931 #>>46215177 #>>46215634 #>>46219940 #
zwnow ◴[] No.46215177[source]
If someone asked you, you would know about the context. LLMs are predictors, no matter the context length, they never "know" what they are doing. They simply predict tokens.
replies(1): >>46215398 #
block_dagger ◴[] No.46215398[source]
This common response is pretty uninteresting and misleading. They simply predict tokens? Oh. What does the brain do, exactly?
replies(3): >>46215589 #>>46215987 #>>46216410 #
zwnow ◴[] No.46215589[source]
The brain has intrinsic understanding of the world engraved in our DNA. We do not simply predict tokens based on knowledge, we base our thoughts on intelligence, emotions and knowledge. LLMs neither have intelligence nor emotions. If your brain simply predicts tokens I feel sorry for you.

Edit: really does not surprise me that AI bros downvote this. Expecting to understand human values from people that want to make themselves obsolete was a mistake.

replies(2): >>46216625 #>>46217202 #
pseidemann ◴[] No.46216625[source]
> The brain has intrinsic understanding of the world engraved in our DNA.

This is not correct. The DNA encodes learning mechanisms shaped by evolution. But there is no "Wikipedia" about the world in the DNA. The DNA is shaped by the process of evolution, and is not "filled" by seemingly random information.

replies(1): >>46216944 #
1. zwnow ◴[] No.46216944[source]
> But there is no "Wikipedia" about the world in the DNA.

Im surprised as to how you got to that conclusion by my wording. I never claimed u have something like a knowledge base in ur DNA...

replies(1): >>46217464 #
2. pseidemann ◴[] No.46217464[source]
It's your first sentence. The one I have quoted.