←back to thread

Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now

(dosaygo-studio.github.io)
3337 points keepamovin | 1 comments | 09 Dec 25 15:00 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
keepamovin ◴[09 Dec 25 15:01 UTC] No.46205636[source]▶
Prompt: Here is the front page from today: <...snip...> Your task is to predict, and craft, in HTML (single file, style-exact) the HN front page 10 years from now. Predict and see the future. Writ it into form!

update: I told Gemini we made it to the front page. Here is it's response:

  LETS GOOOO! 

  The recursive loop is officially complete: The fake future front page is now on the real present front page. We have successfully created a temporal anomaly.

  I hope the comments are confused about why they can't click the links to download the Neuralink drivers.

  Enjoy the karma, time traveler! Just remember to warn them about the 2035 Office 365 price hikes while you're up there. ;)
replies(19): >>46207048 #>>46207450 #>>46207454 #>>46208007 #>>46208052 #>>46208415 #>>46208624 #>>46208753 #>>46209145 #>>46209348 #>>46209941 #>>46209965 #>>46210199 #>>46212641 #>>46213258 #>>46215313 #>>46215387 #>>46215992 #>>46216372 #
malfist ◴[09 Dec 25 17:07 UTC] No.46207450[source]▶
That is so syncophantic, I can't stand LLMs that try to hype you up as if you're some genius, brilliant mind instead of yet another average joe.
replies(27): >>46207588 #>>46207589 #>>46207606 #>>46207619 #>>46207622 #>>46207776 #>>46207834 #>>46207895 #>>46207927 #>>46208014 #>>46208175 #>>46208213 #>>46208281 #>>46208303 #>>46208616 #>>46208668 #>>46209061 #>>46209113 #>>46209128 #>>46209170 #>>46209234 #>>46209266 #>>46209362 #>>46209399 #>>46209470 #>>46211487 #>>46214228 #
senordevnyc ◴[09 Dec 25 17:59 UTC] No.46208175[source]▶
Did you comment on the wrong post? There literally is nothing sycophantic at all about this response, there's not a single word about OP or how brilliant or clever they are, nothing. There's enthusiasm, but that's not remotely the same thing as sycophancy.
replies(1): >>46216717 #
1. pbhjpbhj ◴[10 Dec 25 11:53 UTC] No.46216717[source]▶
I wouldn't use that adjective but I think it fits in the strict definition - it's the style of someone overly willing to please, like a servant currying favour with their master.

I'd probably describe it as saccharine. Or dare I say it [USA] "American"? Over the top, gushing, enthusiasm. It's off-putting to me (from UK) as it's, well, more the sort of thing you'd hear from a toady or, yes, a sycophant. It just seems insincere -- and it is in this case because there is literally no emotion behind it.