←back to thread

375 points italophil | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
treetalker ◴[] No.46213053[source]
Butterick on TNR:

(https://practicaltypography.com/times-new-roman-alternatives...)

> When Times New Roman appears in a book, document, or advertisement, it connotes apathy. It says, “I submitted to the font of least resistance.” Times New Roman is not a font choice so much as the absence of a font choice, like the blackness of deep space is not a color. To look at Times New Roman is to gaze into the void.

> If you have a choice about using Times New Roman, please stop. Use something else.

And on Calibri:

(https://practicaltypography.com/calibri-alternatives.html)

> Like Cambria, Calibri works well on screen. But in print, its rounded corners make body text look soft. If you need a clean sans serif font, you have better options.

- - -

To telegraph an identity, TNR is a good choice for this administration; so, credit where due, well played. Still, I would have gone with Comic Sans.

replies(7): >>46213082 #>>46213338 #>>46214070 #>>46214541 #>>46218652 #>>46225585 #>>46228205 #
nalnq ◴[] No.46213082[source]
The Times New Roman commentary could have been true back when it was written, but now Calibri is the default for Microsoft Word, and has been for a long while (almost 20 years). So choosing Calibri is the path of least resistance.
replies(2): >>46213278 #>>46215032 #
1. rob74 ◴[] No.46215032[source]
So now Times New Roman not only looks uninspired and bland, but also dated? Yeah, I would say that's a good fit...