/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Linux CVEs, more than you ever wanted to know
(www.kroah.com)
103 points
voxadam
| 2 comments |
09 Dec 25 22:47 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.4s
|
source
Show context
throw329084
◴[
09 Dec 25 23:25 UTC
]
No.
46212124
[source]
▶
>>46211802 (OP)
#
This blog post, brought to you by the man who wants to burn down the CVE system
https://lwn.net/Articles/1049140/
replies(4):
>>46213146
#
>>46213269
#
>>46213912
#
>>46214240
#
1.
DeepYogurt
◴[
10 Dec 25 02:17 UTC
]
No.
46213269
[source]
▶
>>46212124
#
To be fair the CVE system can't even encode a version string
replies(1):
>>46215182
#
ID:
GO
2.
spockz
◴[
10 Dec 25 07:44 UTC
]
No.
46215182
[source]
▶
>>46213269 (TP)
#
Not sure whether this is a limitation of the scanning tooling or of the CVE format itself, it also cannot express sub packages. So if some Jackson-very-specific-module has a CVE the whole of Jackson gets marked as impacted. Same with netty.
↑