←back to thread

3337 points keepamovin | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gslaller ◴[] No.46209011[source]
Just did the same with claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929

https://2035.future-hackernews.workers.dev/news

The page looks much more consistent to the original. Only produced the html as output and the thinking in the comment of the html.

replies(4): >>46209768 #>>46210045 #>>46210204 #>>46211206 #
ascorbic ◴[] No.46210204[source]
Claude has better predictions but they're not funny. Gemini's one is genuinely funny. This is exactly the opposite of what I'd expect.
replies(1): >>46211542 #
1. ewoodrich ◴[] No.46211542[source]
I wouldn't describe most of Claude's predictions as better, they seem to skew towards wildly over optimistic futurism/science-fantasy:

  "SpaceX announces Mars City Alpha is now self-sustaining (spacex.com)" 

  Show HN: I built an IDE for direct neural programming (thoughtexchange.io)
Gemini's SpaceX post is at least in the ballpark of plausibility 10 yrs from now:

  First successful telemetry from Starship HLS-9 on the Sea of Tranquility (spacex.com)
replies(1): >>46215291 #
2. ascorbic ◴[] No.46215291[source]
OK, they're more realistic then. It seems to have made an actual attempt to be accurate, whereas Gemini chose satire and was surprisingly good at it.