←back to thread

3337 points keepamovin | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.314s | source
Show context
nine_k ◴[] No.46208915[source]
I have hard time believing this is AI-generated. Every headline looks like a hand-crafted ironic nod to some long-running HN topic, sci-fi trait, or meme.

But it is, of course, more trendy (and more ironic) to proclaim an AI the author.

replies(4): >>46209013 #>>46209911 #>>46211572 #>>46212120 #
1. craigds ◴[] No.46209911[source]
i agree. the thing that stands out to me is that almost every entry is quite notable - i.e. each entry would have a vote/comment count in at least the multiple-hundreds if not more. and all those events in one homepage seems very unrealistic.

it seems human generated to me or at least prompted with a stronger bias for choosing events that would be interesting to readers, not just a pure extrapolation of the current homepage into the future

replies(1): >>46212513 #
2. Libidinalecon ◴[] No.46212513[source]
This is just absurd.

You can just tell in this thread who really hasn't used these models much at all.

replies(1): >>46214549 #
3. craigds ◴[] No.46214549[source]
what's absurd? i haven't claimed it's not capable of this, just that the predictions seem more tailored to elicit a certain recognition from humans rather than chosen based on an honest attempt to predict a possible future HN homepage. Since the prompt apparently didn't include such a modifier, and as far as I know Gemini isn't trained by default to do so, I call shenanigans.