←back to thread

115 points harambae | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stock_toaster ◴[] No.46208576[source]
Wild idea... Maybe tax wealth instead of income?

Tax break on single home ownership, but significantly increased tax on multi-home-ownership?

It would be interesting to see comparisons between PE ownership in markets with property tax vs markets without.

replies(4): >>46208673 #>>46208780 #>>46208917 #>>46209521 #
mrDmrTmrJ ◴[] No.46208780[source]
Well, I want more multifamily housing (apartments or condos) to lower prices in good cities near pubic transit.

So let me propose: a wealth tax on land! ("Georgism"). But not a tax on the "value of improvements," i.e, buildings. This disincentivizes single-family homes near train stations (widespread in the town I grew up in) and is very low-cost to collect.

I don't know where you're writing from. But here in California, the source of all evil (Prop 13) originated with single-family homeowners trying to *escape the property taxes that result from their opposing new development.

Given how spectacularly CA housing policy has failed, perhaps it's time to try the opposite: Let's abolish all income taxes and exclusively tax land instead! (Land taxes have the property of being extremely progressive wealth taxes that are dead simple to administer.)

replies(1): >>46209452 #
1. the_sleaze_ ◴[] No.46209452[source]
Now my corporation owns my house, I rent from myself and since the rent my corp is charging is so incredibly low its essentially a write off.
replies(1): >>46210042 #
2. quesera ◴[] No.46210042[source]
That arrangement will not pass IRS muster.

Not that the system would not be abused, but the obvious exploit is not going to work.