←back to thread

3337 points keepamovin | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.077s | source | bottom
Show context
keepamovin ◴[] No.46205636[source]
Prompt: Here is the front page from today: <...snip...> Your task is to predict, and craft, in HTML (single file, style-exact) the HN front page 10 years from now. Predict and see the future. Writ it into form!

update: I told Gemini we made it to the front page. Here is it's response:

  LETS GOOOO! 

  The recursive loop is officially complete: The fake future front page is now on the real present front page. We have successfully created a temporal anomaly.

  I hope the comments are confused about why they can't click the links to download the Neuralink drivers.

  Enjoy the karma, time traveler! Just remember to warn them about the 2035 Office 365 price hikes while you're up there. ;)
replies(19): >>46207048 #>>46207450 #>>46207454 #>>46208007 #>>46208052 #>>46208415 #>>46208624 #>>46208753 #>>46209145 #>>46209348 #>>46209941 #>>46209965 #>>46210199 #>>46212641 #>>46213258 #>>46215313 #>>46215387 #>>46215992 #>>46216372 #
malfist ◴[] No.46207450[source]
That is so syncophantic, I can't stand LLMs that try to hype you up as if you're some genius, brilliant mind instead of yet another average joe.
replies(27): >>46207588 #>>46207589 #>>46207606 #>>46207619 #>>46207622 #>>46207776 #>>46207834 #>>46207895 #>>46207927 #>>46208014 #>>46208175 #>>46208213 #>>46208281 #>>46208303 #>>46208616 #>>46208668 #>>46209061 #>>46209113 #>>46209128 #>>46209170 #>>46209234 #>>46209266 #>>46209362 #>>46209399 #>>46209470 #>>46211487 #>>46214228 #
TimTheTinker ◴[] No.46208014[source]
I've talked and commented about the dangers of conversations with LLMs (i.e. they activate human social wiring and have a powerful effect, even if you know it's not real. Studies show placebo pills have a statistically significant effect even when the study participant knows it's a placebo -- the effect here is similar).

Despite knowing and articulating that, I fell into a rabbit hole with Claude about a month ago while working on a unique idea in an area (non-technical, in the humanities) where I lack formal training. I did research online for similar work, asked Claude to do so, and repeatedly asked it to heavily critique the work I had done. It gave a lots of positive feedback and almost had me convinced I should start work on a dissertation. I was way out over my skis emotionally and mentally.

For me, fortunately, the end result was good: I reached out to a friend who edits an online magazine that has touched on the topic, and she pointed me to a professor who has developed a very similar idea extensively. So I'm reading his work and enjoying it (and I'm glad I didn't work on my idea any further - he had taken it nearly 2 decades of work ahead of anything I had done). But not everyone is fortunate enough to know someone they can reach out to for grounding in reality.

replies(6): >>46208103 #>>46208473 #>>46208543 #>>46209584 #>>46209810 #>>46210502 #
baq ◴[] No.46208103[source]
> But not everyone is fortunate enough to know someone they can reach out to for grounding in reality.

this shouldn't stop you at all: write it all up, post on HN and go viral, someone will jump in to correct you and point you at sources while hopefully not calling you, or your mother, too many names.

https://xkcd.com/386/

replies(2): >>46208253 #>>46208489 #
1. freehorse ◴[] No.46208489[source]
Most stuff posted here are mostly ignored, though. If grounding to reality requires one to become viral first, we are cooked.
replies(1): >>46209088 #
2. DANmode ◴[] No.46209088[source]
HN frontpage hardly requires being viral.

Just genuine intrigue from a select few.

replies(3): >>46209314 #>>46209317 #>>46209377 #
3. Retric ◴[] No.46209314[source]
It’s still way easier the first time.

The 50th time someone comes to the same conclusion nobody on HN is going to upvote the topic.

4. vbezhenar ◴[] No.46209317[source]
Did you ever visit `https://news.ycombinator.com/newest` page? Like 99% of submitted topics are never seen by anyone but few wanderers.
replies(2): >>46209473 #>>46210012 #
5. ghurtado ◴[] No.46209377[source]
> HN frontpage hardly requires virility.

As far as I can tell, it doesn't require femininity either.

I'm guessing you meant "virality"

replies(1): >>46209489 #
6. DANmode ◴[] No.46209473{3}[source]
Often.

95%+ of submitted topics have poorly formatted titles, are submitted at off-peak times where there’s less users of demographics who might upvote,

and if your Show HN isn’t as widely applicable as this, those things might be important to think about.

Fairness aside, of course.

7. DANmode ◴[] No.46209489{3}[source]
Sure did, thanks.
8. chairmansteve ◴[] No.46210012{3}[source]
I prefer the "New" page. Much more random.